A Lever, Not a Replacement: Growing Your Talents in Code and Math With AI

There's a line traditionally attributed to Archimedes: give me a place to stand and a lever long enough, and I will move the world. I keep coming back to it when people ask me whether AI is going to replace them. A lever doesn't replace the person pushing it. It multiplies what they bring.

A lever needs someone to push

That's the part of the metaphor I don't want us to miss. A lever with no one behind it moves nothing. The same is true of AI tools for code, math, and quantitative work. They can multiply your effort enormously, but they multiply what's there. Bring curiosity, skill, and good questions, and the tool takes you further than you could go alone. Bring nothing, and you get confident-sounding output you can't evaluate.

So the question I'd rather ask isn't "Will AI replace me?" It's "What am I bringing to the lever?" That's a question each of us gets to answer, and the answer can grow.

The parable of the talents

In the Gospel of Matthew (25:14–30), Jesus tells a story about a master who entrusts his servants with talents, a large sum of money in that day, before going on a journey. Two of them put what they were given to work and grow it. The third, afraid of losing it, buries his talent in the ground. When the master returns, he celebrates the two who used what they were given, and he's disappointed in the one who hid it.

I've always read that story as being about more than money. Each of us has been given gifts. For some people it's a head for numbers. For others it's patience with code, or an ear for music, or a knack for explaining hard ideas simply. I believe those gifts come from God, and that they're meant to be used and grown, not buried out of fear.

Fear of automation can tempt us to bury our talents: to stop learning because "the machine will do it anyway." I think the better response is the one the faithful servants chose. Put the gift to work. Use every good tool available, including AI, to grow it.

Using AI to grow your skill in code

Using AI to grow your skill in math

Using AI to grow your quantitative judgment

The most valuable quantitative skill isn't computing. It's judgment: framing a question so it can be answered, noticing when a number doesn't make sense, and being honest about how certain you are. Tools can run the model. You decide whether the question was right and whether the answer is believable.

A good habit is to ask every result three questions. Does it pass a rough sanity check? How would I know if it's wrong? How uncertain is it? That last one is the subject of my new companion piece, Honest About Uncertainty, a plain-language guide to prediction intervals.

The creative process is a gift too

For me, building something, whether it's a model, a proof, a song, or a small game, is one of the places I feel most connected to God. There's a quiet joy in the moment an idea finally clicks. I don't want to hand that moment away. I'd rather use tools that let me have more of those moments, and reach further when I do.

That's how I try to use AI: as a way to spend less time on the tedious parts and more time on the parts that require a person, the questions, the meaning, and the care.

We grow faster together

None of us grows our talents alone. I learned from teachers, classmates, colleagues, and people I've never met who posted clear explanations online. If you're learning code, math, or data science, find people to learn with. Share your work in public, even when it's small. Ask questions. Answer someone else's.

If you're working on something and want a second set of eyes, I'd love to hear about it. And if anything on this site has helped you along the way, the support options below are how these articles, games, and music stay free for everyone.

Learning to use AI in your code, math, or analytics work and want to talk it through? I'm always happy to help.

Email Sam to set up a call